Survey on routines in udder health management and therapy of mastitis on German dairy farms

Authors

  • U. Falkenberg
  • V. Krömker
  • W. Heuwieser
  • C. Fischer-Tenhagen

Keywords:

survey, mastitis treatment, antimicrobials, udder health management

Abstract

The objective of this study was to gain information on udder health management and the use of antimicrobials in mastitis in dairy cows. The role of
veterinarians in udder health management on dairy farms in Germany was a further focal point of this study. A total of 499 completed survey forms
were returned by participating farms from nine federal states. Questionnaires revealed that the largest proportion of farms (32.1 %) were visited by
their veterinarian on a weekly basis. The farm veterinarian was named most frequently as consultant for udder health (91.6%), followed by bovine
health services (33.1%), agricultural consultants (27.5%) and other dairy professionals (20.0%). Fifty-eight percent of respondents had concise knowledge
of parameters from the monthly udder health report submitted by the German Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) organizations. Respondents
from large farms (>500 cows) showed a significantly larger familiarity with udder health report contents than small farms (<100 cows) (p < 0.05).
Clinical cases of mastitis were treated on all farms, although only 74.9% of participants reported immediate use of antimicrobials after diagnosis.
Regular use of penicillin, other ß-lactam-antimicrobials, macrolids and lincomycin was reported by 356 participants (78.4 %) with 363 participants
(80%) reporting additional or sole use of fluorchinolones or 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporines in mastitis therapy.
Our results show that the farm veterinarian plays an integral role in mastitis management on German farms. A heavier focus should be directed at
utilizing available udder health data for development of preventive and treatment protocols.

References

Van Soest FJ, Santman-Berends IM, Lam TJ, Hogeveen H. Failure and preventive costs of mastitis on Dutch dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 8365-8374.

Zwald AG, Ruegg PL, Kaneene JB, Warnick LD, Wells SJ, Fossler C, Halbert LW. Management practices and reported antimicrobial usage on conventional and organic dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87:191-201.

Pol M, Ruegg PL. Treatment practices and quantification of antimicrobial drug usage in conventional and organic dairy farms in Wisconsin. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:249-261.

Machado VS, Bicalho RC. Prepartum application of internal teat sealant or intramammary amoxicillin on dairy heifers: Effect on udder health, survival, and performance. J Dairy Sci 2017; 101:1388-1402.

Dufour S, Fréchette A, Barkema HW, Mussell A, Scholl DT. Invited review: effect of udder health management practices on herd somatic cell count. J. Dairy Sci 2011; 94:563-579.

Krömker V, Friedrich J. Modernes Monitoring zur Entwicklung der Eutergesundheit auf Herdenebene. Kompendium Nutztier 2012, Enke Verlag, Germany:18-20.

Behr B, Hachenberg S. Strategisches Eutergesundheitsmonitoring – erste Ergebnisse einer deutschlandweiten Umsetzung. Page 202-208 pigs, bovine, poultry Proc bpt- Kongress, Hannover 2016

Jansen J, Van den Borne BH, Renes RJ, Van Schaik G, Lam TJ, Leeuwis C. Explaining mastitis incidence in Dutch dairy farming: the influence of farmers’ attitudes and behavior. Prev Vet Med 2009; 92:210-223.

McDougall S, Compton C, Botha N. Factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing by veterinarians and usage by dairy farmers in New Zealand. N Z Vet J 2017; 65:84-92.

Hesse A, Bertulat S, Heuwieser W. Survey of work processes on German dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100:6583-6591.

Vasquez AK, Nydam DV, Capel MB, Eicker S, Virkler PD. Clinical outcome comparison of immediate blanket treatment versus a delayed pathogen-based treatment protocol for clinical mastitis in a New York dairy herd. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100:2992-3003.

Whist AC, Osterås O, Sølverød L. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus dysgalactiae in Norwegian herds after introduction of selective dry cow therapy and teat dipping. J Dairy Res 2007; 74:1-8.

Kiesner K, Wente N, Volling O, Krömker V. Selection of cows for treatment at dry-off on organic dairy farms. J Dairy Res 2016; 83:468-475.

Bertulat, S, Fischer-Tenhagen C, Heuwieser W. A survey of drying-off practices on commercial dairy farms in northern Germany and a comparison to science-based recommendations. Vet Rec 2015; 2:1-10.

Gibbons JF, Boland F, Buckley JF, Butler F, Egan J, Fanning S, Markey BK, Leonard FC. Influences on antimicrobial prescribing behavior of veterinary practitioners in cattle practice in Ireland. Vet. Rec. 2013 172:14-19.

Mansion-de Vries EM, Hoedemaker M, Krömker V. Evidence-based aspects of clinical mastitis treatment. Tierarztl Prac Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere 2015; 43:287-295.

Gao J, Barkema HW, Zhang L, Liu G, Deng Z, Cai L, Shan R, Zhang S, Zou J, Kastelic JP, Han B. Incidence of clinical mastitis and distribution of pathogens on large Chinese dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100:4797-4814.

Swinkels JM, Hilkens A, Zoche-Golob V, Krömker V, Buddiger M, Jansen J, Lam TJ. Social influences on the duration of antibiotic treatment of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98:2369-2380.

De Briyne, N, Atkinson J, Pokludova Borriello SP. Antibiotics used most commonly to treat animals in Europe. Vet Rec 2014; 175:325-333.

GVA (German Veterinary Association). Deutsche Leitlinien Bekämpfung der Mastitis des Rindes, 2012, 5th edition. Gießen, Germany: German Veterinary Association, Friedrichstraße 17, D-35392 Gießen.

Published

2019-04-11